The Jewish Sects during the time of Christ



The Jewish Sects during the time of Christ

I.           Pharisees
A.      The Early History of the Pharisees
1.     According to Josephus the Pharisees emerged as a recognizable sect about 160 BC during the time of Jonathan, the brother and successor of Judas Maccabees.
2.     The name means “separatists,” - those who carefully kept themselves from any legal contamination, distinguishing themselves by their care in such matters from the common people, who of course had fewer scruples.
3.     Their chief aim was to preserve the Jews and their heritage from the corrupting influences of the Greek’s and then the Romans.
B.      Their Influence and Popularity
1.     They exercised a great influence over the people for almost three centuries and did more than any other party to determine the shape of Judaism in the years to come.
2.     They were staunch defenders of the Torah, but maintained that oral law should be regarded as of equal authority with the written law.
3.     By teaching and interpreting both written and oral law and by applying it to every day life they made their religion more personal and operative in the experience of the common people.
4.     Now remember that being a Pharisee did not necessarily make you a bad person, for there were such good men as Nicodemus, Gamaliel, Joseph of Arimathea and Paul.
C.      The Hedge About The Law
Mat 23:1-7 “Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples:  2) The Pharisees and the teachers of the Law are experts in the Law of Moses.  3)  So obey everything they teach you, but don't do as they do. After all, they say one thing and do something else.  4)  They pile heavy burdens on people's shoulders and won't lift a finger to help.  5)  Everything they do is just to show off in front of others. They even make a big show of wearing Scripture verses on their foreheads and arms, and they wear big tassels for everyone to see.  6)  They love the best seats at banquets and the front seats in the meeting places.  7) And when they are in the market, they like to have people greet them as their teachers.”
1.     The fundamental principle of all of the Pharisees, common to them with all orthodox modern Jews, is that, by the side of the written law, regarded as a summary of the principles and general laws of the Hebrew people, there was an oral law to complete, and to explain the written law, given to Moses on Mount Sinai, and transmitted by him by word of mouth.
2.     The first portion of the Talmud (Which was a commentary or interpretation on the Taanach, what we call the Old Testament.), called the Mishna or "second law", contains this oral law. It is a digest of the Jewish traditions and a compendium of the whole ritual law, and it came at length to be esteemed far above the sacred text.
3.     For they not only want to keep the commandment, but they wanted to be so cautious that they don’t even come close to breaking it, or put themselves in a position to break it. So they set other standards that they won’t violate, that keep them from even approaching the one that is actually a violation of the commandment.

a.     For instance, the Law said in Exo. 31:14, “Therefore you are to observe the Sabbath, for it is holy to you. Everyone who profanes it shall surely be put to death; for whoever does any work on it, that person shall be cut off from among his people.”
b.     That sounds pretty serious don’t you think, so it would be wise of you not to break the Sabbath. But, what does that mean, “no work”?
c.      And so the religious leaders set up additional teachings of what constituted “working on the Sabbath”, for instance:
1)    How far could you walk before it became "work"?
2)    How much could you carry in your hand without it constituting a "burden" and thus work?

4.     Another example: For instance, there is an Old Testament law not to cook a young goat in its own mother’s milk (Exo 23:19).
a.     From this law, the experts in the law decided that you cannot eat milk and meat in the same meal.
b.     In fact, you cannot even use the same dishes for milk as you use for meat – you need two sets of dishes.
5.     For example, instead of not doing work for 24 hours on the Sabbath, they made it 25 hours to guard against breaking God’s law.
6.     Another example, in a desire not to break the Second Commandment by taking the Lord’s name in vain, the Pharisees chose not to use the name of the Lord at all—with the result that people lost touch with the proper use of God’s name altogether (which also breaks the Second Commandment) and with the additional result that the original pronunciation of God’s name, Yahweh, was lost altogether. 
7.     While it was the aim of Jesus to call men to the law of God itself as the supreme guide of life, the Pharisees, upon the pretence of maintaining it intact, multiplied minute precepts and distinctions, to such an extent that the whole life of the Israelite was hemmed in, and burdened on every side, by instructions so numerous and trifling, that the law was almost if not wholly lost sight of.
II.       The Sadducees
A.      Origin and History
1.     This prominent Jewish sect, though not as numerous as their opponents, the Pharisees, but their wealth and the priestly descent of many of them had an influence which fully balanced that of their more popular rivals. They were a political party, of priestly and aristocratic tendency, as against the more religious and democratic Pharisees.
2.     The probability is that the name is derived from some person named “Zadok.” The most prominent Zadok in history was the Davidic high priest (2 Sam 8:17; 2 Sam 15:24; 1 Kgs 1:35), from whom all succeeding high priests claimed to descend. It is in harmony with this, that in the New Testament the Sadducees are the party to whom the high priests belonged.
3.     Unlike the Pharisees the Sadducees denied the resurrection of the body, and did not believe in angels or spirits (Mat 22:23; Act 23:8).
4.     Like the Pharisees the Sadducees seem to have emerged as a recognizable sect about 160 BC during the time of Jonathan, the brother and successor of Judas Maccabees.
5.     There was constantly bitter rivalry between these two sects. The Pharisees were affiliated with the Maccabees (Who were in favor of restoring Israel to its former glory and independence from heathen nations, they also became known as the Hasmoneans.) and the Sadducees with the Hellenizing movement (they were more interested in looking up to the Greeks.
6.     It has been suggested that the earlier form of the conflict between the Sadducees and Pharisees was opposition between the priests and the prophets.
7.     With the destruction of the temple in 70 AD and the fall of the Jewish state the Sadducean party disappeared.
B.      Doctrines of the Sadducees
1.     The most prominent doctrine of the Sadducees was the denial of the immortality of the soul and of the resurrection of the body.
2.     From Acts (Act 23:8) we learn that they believed in neither angel nor spirit.” As appearances of angels are mentioned in the Law, it is difficult to harmonize their reverence for the Law with this denial.
3.     Josephus (the Jewish historian) distinctly asserts that the Sadducees believe that the soul dies with the body. They deny, he says, divine providence. Their theology might be called “religion within the limits of mere sensation.”
4.     The Fathers, Hippolytus, Origen and Jerome, credit the Sadducees with regarding the Pentateuch as alone canonical.
5.     It follows from the little value they put upon the Prophets that they had no sympathy with the Messianic hopes of the Pharisees.
C.      Character of the Sadducees
1.     Josephus says that while the Pharisees have amiable manners and cultivate concord among all, the Sadducees are “very boorish.
2.     This want of manners is not a characteristic usually associated with an aristocracy, or with supple diplomats, yet it suits what we find in the New Testament.
3.     The cruel horseplay indulged in when our Lord was tried before the irregular meeting of the Sanhedrin (Mat 26:67, Mat 26:68), the shout of Ananias at the trial of Paul before the same tribunal to “smite him on the mouth,” show them to be rough and overbearing.
III.   Scribes
A.      Scribes: “Teachers of the Law”
1.     The earliest mention of the title occurs in I Esdras 7:6, where Esdras is described as a "ready scribe in the law of Moses". What this meant is set forth in verse 10: "For Esdras had prepared his heart to teach in Israel the commandments and judgment". This description doubtless applies to the subsequent scribes of that period.
2.     The existence of law leads necessarily to a profession whose business is the study and knowledge of the law
3.     At the time of Ezra and probably for some time after, this was chiefly the business of the priests.
4.     However, the spoken language was becoming Aramaic, so that at this time an interpretation of the Hebrew Scriptures, the basis of their national and religious restoration, was a primary necessity to the exiles just returned from Babylon (Neh 8:8-13).
5.     The priests were therefore also in the first instance the scholars and the guardians of the Law; but in the course of time this was changed.
B.      History of the Scribes
1.     The more highly esteemed the Law became in the eyes of the people, the more its study and interpretation became a lifework by itself, and thus there developed a class of scholars who, though not priests, devoted themselves assiduously to the Law.
2.     These became known as the scribes, that is, the professional students of the Law. During the Hellenistic period, the priests, especially those of the upper class, became tainted with the Hellenism of the age and frequently turned their attention to paganistic culture, thus neglecting the Law of their fathers more or less and arousing the scribes to opposition.
3.     Thus, the scribes and not the priests were now the zealous defenders of the Law, and hence, were the true teachers of the people. At the time of Christ, this distinction was complete. The scribes formed a solid profession which held undisputed sway over the thought of the people.
4.     In the New Testament they are also “called lawyers”, “doctors of the law” or “students of the law”.
5.     Scribes were not a separate religious party but were more of a professional group of teachers. The word scribe literally means “learned in the law”. Scribes had a four fold task:
a.     They copied the Law.
b.     They interpreted the Law.
c.      They taught the Law.
d.     They were to administer the Law.
IV.     The Essenes
A.      Origin and History
1.     The Essenes emerged out of disgust with the Pharisees and Sadducees. This sect believed the others had corrupted the city and the Temple. They moved out of Jerusalem and lived a monastic life in the desert, adopting strict dietary laws and a commitment to celibacy.
2.     The Essenes are particularly interesting to scholars because they are believed to be an offshoot of the group that lived in Qumran, near the Dead Sea. In 1947, a Bedouin shepherd stumbled into a cave containing various ancient artifacts and jars containing manuscripts describing the beliefs of the sect and events of the time.
3.     This find later became known as the Dead Sea Scrolls.
4.     The most important documents, often only parchment fragments that had to be meticulously restored, were the earliest known copies of the Old Testament. The similarity of the substance of the material found in the scrolls to that in the modern scriptures has confirmed the authenticity of the Bible used today.
5.     The most likely meaning of the word is either “doers” or “healers.”
6.     The later seems the most likely preference is for the latter, as one of the characteristics of the Essenes dwelt upon by Josephus is the fact that they were healers by means of herbs and incantations.
7.     The extreme probability, from the fact that the name is not found in the New Testament, is that it was the nature of a nickname, like “Quakers” applied to the Society of Friends. The multitude that followed Our Lord affords evidence of the influence that a reputation for healing gave to one.
B.      Doctrines
1.     They believed in the absolute preordination by God of everything.
2.     The believed in the resurrection of the body.
3.     They repudiate marriage because they look on woman as a selfish creature and specially addicted to jealousy and hypocrisy, thus likely to dissolve their brotherhood. A man bound to a woman is hampered by his affection, is no longer a free man but a slave.
4.     They teach the immortality of souls and a state of rewards and punishments.
5.     Although they dedicated gifts to the temple they offered no sacrifices, presumably bloody sacrifices, as they have offerings of their own.
V.         The Zealots, Cananæans or Assassins
A.      Origen and History
1.     Simon, one of the apostles, was called “the Zealot”, meaning “to rival,” “emulate,” “be jealous,” “admire,” or “desire greatly.” (Mat 10:4; Mar 3:18; Luke 6:15; Act 1:13)
2.     The Cananæans or Zealots were a sect founded by Judas of Gamala, who headed the opposition to the census of Quirinius (A.D. 6 or 7).
3.     They were afterwards called Sicarii, from their use of the sica, i.e., the Roman dagger.
B.      The Zealots Beliefs
1.     According to Josephus they resorted to violence and assassination in their hatred of the foreigner, and that they agree in all other things with the Pharisaic notions; but they have an inviolable attachment to liberty, and say that God is to be their only Ruler and Lord.
2.     It is not improbable that the “Assassins” of Act 21:38 were identical, or at least closely associated, with this body of “Zealots,” to which we must conclude that Simon had belonged before he became one of the Twelve.
3.     They bitterly resented the domination of Rome, and would fain have hastened by the sword the fulfillment of the Messianic hope.
4.     They taught that all foreign rule over Jews was unscriptural, and opposed that rule in every way.
5.     During the great rebellion and the siege of Jerusalem, this ended in its destruction (A.D. 70); their fanaticism made them terrible opponents, not only to the Romans, but to other factions amongst their own countrymen.


Comments